Fed/court cases Word Scramble
|
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
| Question | Answer |
| Dual Federalism | (1789-1901) the idea that National/State governments were equal partners with separate spheres of authority |
| League of Cities vs. Usury | does NOT demonsrate the ability of federal government to become involved in State government affairs |
| Federal Government did become involved in State affairs in these cases: | Baker vs. Carr, Garcia vs. San Antonio, Brown vs. Board |
| Cooperative Federalism | (1901-1960)greater collaboration between various leves of government. Federal Government was seen as a servant of the states. |
| Marbury vs. Madison | the decision established the right of the courts to determine the constitutionality of the actions of the other two branes of government |
| Dred Scott vs. Sanford | to sue for his freedom, then it was determined that slaves were not citizens nd couldn't sue in court |
| Plessy vs. Ferguson | Homer Plessy was jailed for purposely sitting in a white railroad car. Decision said that "separate" facilities were constitutional as long as they were equal |
| Brown vs. Board | racial segregation in schools violated to 14th ammendment |
| Roe vs. Wade | woman's choice to have an abortion is protected by her right to privacy |
Created by:
cgering@my.wgu.edu