World's most versatile flashcards

or...
Reset Password Sign Up

Test and measurement Word Scramble

 
 


 

 
Teachers & Webmasters: If you would like this word scramble activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
 

 

 
Follow us on Twitter
Be a StudyStack fan on Facebook
www.eapps.com




Copyright ©2001-2009 John Weidner All rights reserved.
About -  Terms of Service -  Privacy Statement



Question Answer
Psychology owes the advanced development of reliability assessment to the early work ofCharles Spearman
Abraham introduced the notion ofsampling error
The term error refers to discrepancies that will always exist between....... ability and the ...... of abilitytrue, measurement
the difference between a persons true score and observed score results frommeasurement error
the equation for true/observed scoreX = T + E
Spearman published the earliest work on reliability theory in his 1904 article"The proof and measurement of Association between two things"
The distribution of random errors is what shapebell shaped
Dispersion around the observed scored tells ushow much error there is in the measurement
Classical teat tehory uses the standard deviation of this distribution as a basic measure of error calledthe standard error of measurement
standard error of measurement tells uson average, how much an observed score deviates from a true score
if three random samples of items are selected from the entire domain of all possible items, each of the three samples should yield an unbiased estimate of the ........ related to the domaintrue score
Reliability coeffiecients areratio coefficients that can also be expressed as the ratio of the variance of the true score on a test to the variance of the observed score on a test
reliability coefficients cab be interpreted as the proportion of variation in observed scores that can be attributed toactual differences among people
three methods of estimating test reliabilitytest-retest, parallel form, and internal consistency
test-retestconsideres the consistecy of the test results when the test is admistered on differen occasions
parallel formsevaluate the test across differen froms of the test
internal consistencywe examine how people perform on similar subsets of items selected from the same form of the measure
Test-Retest is appropritate whenit is assumed a trait being measured does not change over time... E.G intelligence
Carryover effectoccur when something about taking the test the firsttime influences the second time the test is taken
carryover effect can lead to an.......... of the true reliability of a testoverestimate
Parallel formsthe correlation between form a and from b of a test
split half methoda test given and divided into halves that are scored separately
Split half method can measureinternal consistency
Problem with split halfhow its split; one half may have more difficult problems than the other half
to correct for half lenght you can use the.... formulaspearman-brown formula
spearman brown formula allows youto estimate what the correlatoin between the two halves would have been if each half had been the length of the who test
spearman brown formulaR= 2r/(1+r) where r is the correlation between the two halves
the spearman brown formula increases thereliability
Coefficient alphaestimates teh internal consistency of tests in which the items are not scored 0 to 1 (right or wrong) in doing so he developed a more general reliability estimate
under what cirumstance is coefficient alpha appropriate measure of internal consisteny reliability of a testwhen items are not dichotomosly scored
all measures of internal consistency (split half, coefficient alpha) evaluate the extent to which the different items on a testmeasure the same ability of trait
if a test is designed to measure several different traits or characteristics, .................., is a good way to examine whether items within subgroups or components are internally consistentfactor analysis
behavirol psychologist prefer to useobservation of behavior opposed to psychological test
To asses the behavioral observations we must asses the reliability of the observer: two waysinterrater reliability or kappa
interrater reliabilitythe consistency among different judges who are evaluating the same behavior
three ways to an observer can evaluate behaviorrecord the precentage of times that two or more observers agree, kappa statistics
kappa statistics was introduced byJ. Cohen in 1960
Kappa statistics isan agreement between two judges who each rate a set of objects using nominal scales.
the standard error of measurement is used to form .........around observed scores. Thconfidence intervals
Confidence intervals allow us to estimate the probability that the ........... falss within certain intervaltrue score
the interval around the observed score is theconfidence interval
if we have an 82 observed score and a 95% CI this means thatwe are 95% that the true score relies around 78-84 interval
when importnat decisions are to be made on the basis of test socre, reliability coefficients should be ...... or higher.95
basic research should have a reliability coefficient of.70 to .80
allows test developers to estimate what the correlation between two measures would have been if the they had not been measured with errorcorrection for attenuation
a reliability of a difference score is expected to belowere that the reliability of either test on which it is based
administering two supposedly equivealent forms of test (form a and form b) to the same group of individuals yilelds a correlation coefficient indicatingalternative forms reliability
what did the suprem court rule in the case of Griggs vs. Duke Power?Employees must provide evidence that a test used for selection of promotion of employees has a specific meaning.
Validity isthe agreement between test score or measure and the quality it is believed to mesure. "Does the test measure what is supposed to?"
Three primary types of evidence that can suppor a tests validityface validity, content, and criterion related validity,
Face validitymere appearance that a mesure has validity. If the items seem to be reasonably related to the perceived purpose of the test.
Face validity is not really validity becauseit does not offer evidence to support conclusions drawn from test scores
consideres the adequacy of representation of the coneptual domain the test is designed to covercontent-related validity
has the test been constructed adequately would be what type of validitycontent
contruct under representation isthe failure to capture important components of a construct
If a math test on included algebra not geometry this would be an example ofconsrtuct under representation
Construct irrelevant variance iswhen scores are influenced by irralevent factors
Test Anxiety, illiness, sleepy, are all factors that might influence a test this is temredconstruct irrelevant variance
Criterion Related Evidence for Validitytells us how well a test corresponds with a particulare criterion. Provided by high correlations between a rest and a well-defined criterion measure
predicitve validitythe forecasting function of test
Concurrent Relate evidence for validity isassessments of thei simultaneous relationships between the test ad the crieterion-- such as between a learning disability and school performance
Validity coefficientrelationship between a test and a criterion is usually expressed a correlation called Validity coefficient
Are scale correlates well with other scales is an example of what type of evidenceConcurrent evidince (under criterion)
Construct validity evidenceis established through a series of activities in the which a reseracher simultaneously defines some construct and develops the instrumentation to measure it.
A construct issomething built by mental synthesis. Ex. Intelligence, love, curiosity, or mental health
convergent evidence- When a measure correlates well with other tests believed to measure the same construct
- Convergent evidence is obtained in one of two ways- 1) we show that a test measures the same things as other tests used for the same purpose.