Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or

show password
Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or

Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account.
Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.


Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.

Object ID

Quiz yourself by thinking what should be in each of the black spaces below before clicking on it to display the answer.
        Help!  

Question
Answer
Object Identification   Simple models of patter recognition. Used with letters and word examples, Template matching, interactive activation models, and Geon Models  
🗑
Interactive Activation Model   What you compare to is a prototypical representation. Good for expanding the idea to objects rather than just words.  
🗑
Template Model   Template stored in your head for each possible input, match the input to the template to identify an object. Problems: Too many possible templates; predicts no learning transfer to novel views of objects  
🗑
Solso & McCarthy   Studied morphed Faces. Then rate faces as new or old and confidence. Prototype models consistent with interactive activation models.  
🗑
Biderman's Geon theory   View invariance Geons can be identified even when viewed from different angles because they have certain invant properties. Discriminablity Geons can be discriminated from each other from almost all viewpoints  
🗑
Pro's and Con's of Geon Theory   Small set of geons can be put together in lots of different ways to make a vast array of objects. Consistent with idea that basic features give rise to object recognition. It has no neurophysiological support for Geon detectors.  
🗑
Geon Theory and Prototype Models   Can all be integrated into a interactive activation model  
🗑
Problems extending object recognition to multiple object scenarios   Distributed coding predicts limitations. The blinding problem, how does information from specialize brain areas get integrated. FIT  
🗑
Tresman's Feature Integration Theory   Sensory features coding in parallel by specialized models. From two kinds of map: feature maps, implicit spatial info, and a master map of locations.  
🗑
Role of Attention in FIT   Moves with in the location map. Selects whatever features are linked to that location. Other locations are excluded. Evidence: visual research, adaption effects  
🗑
FIT   Attention is necessary for object recognition. But attentional capacity is limited. Demos of capacity limits  
🗑
Inattentional Blindness   Gorilla Video  
🗑
Attention Blink   CogLab  
🗑
Change Blindness   CogLab Picture changes  
🗑
Attention   Only aware of a subject of stimuli capacity limits ability to handle different task or stimuli at once  
🗑
Colin Cherry's Experiment   Ear listening and recalling experiments. Findings: cant comprehend both, shadowing is better with pitch difference. Conclusion: non attended ear is processed only to the point of basic perceptual features.  
🗑
Moray's Experiment   would say something 35 repetitions, however would still not remember it, recognition tests  
🗑
Broadbent's   Found that with short lists would report items from one ear than the other... suggested his early attentional selection bottle-neck model.  
🗑
Wood & Cowan   shadow: name appears in "off" channel, people notice name 35% of the time replication. But made errors shadowing at time name +1 and name +2  
🗑
Corteen & Wood   Shock people to city names. Found: same names that we trained 38% GSR response. Other city names 23%. Report: didn't hear, cant repeat from an unwanted channel  
🗑
Stroop Effect   A word that can be in a different color, Very Robust  
🗑
Flanker Effects   Only attend to the central item. Processed to the point of recognition  
🗑
Deutsch & Deutsch   Laste selective attention: 1/3 notice name in cocktail party effect. GSR response in Corteen & Wood smaller when cities appear in unattended channel than attended channel  
🗑
Difference between Early vs. Late Selection   Tasks where memory is involved. The other one has no delay. Implication: Active meaning when items are present but it is not remembered.  
🗑


   

Review the information in the table. When you are ready to quiz yourself you can hide individual columns or the entire table. Then you can click on the empty cells to reveal the answer. Try to recall what will be displayed before clicking the empty cell.
 
To hide a column, click on the column name.
 
To hide the entire table, click on the "Hide All" button.
 
You may also shuffle the rows of the table by clicking on the "Shuffle" button.
 
Or sort by any of the columns using the down arrow next to any column heading.
If you know all the data on any row, you can temporarily remove it by tapping the trash can to the right of the row.

 
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how
Created by: 1248150307
Popular Science sets