click below
click below
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Negligence
Question | Answer |
---|---|
Blythe v Birmingham (pipe) | Defined negligence as reasonable man |
Donoghue v Stevenson (snail) | Modern law of negligence and neighbour test |
Caparo v Dickman (shares) | Created Caparo Test |
Kent v Griffiths | Ambulance delayed - foreseeable |
Bourhill v Young | Pregnant fishwife - not foreseeable |
Haley v London Electricity Board | Trench in path - foreseeable |
Roe v Ministry of Health | Anaesthetic contaminated - not foreseeable |
Bourhill v Young | Pregnant fishwife - no proximity |
McLoughlin v O'Brian | Family car crash - proximity in relationship |
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd. | Young offendors crash - proximity |
MPC v Reeves | Lynch on suicide watch - reasonable |
Orange v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire | Orange not suicide risk - not reasonable |
Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester | Jumped out of window - not reasonable |
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire | Final victim of Yorkshire Ripper - not reasonable |
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council | Killed after long dispute - not reasonable |