Save
Busy. Please wait.
Log in with Clever
or
show password
Forgot Password?
Don't have an account?  Sign up 
Sign up using Clever
or
Username is available taken
show password


Make sure to remember your password. If you forget it there is no way for StudyStack to send you a reset link. You would need to create a new account. Your email address is only used to allow you to reset your password. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Already a StudyStack user? Log In

Reset Password
Enter the associated with your account, and we'll email you a link to reset your password.
focusNode
Didn't know it?
click below
 
Knew it?
click below
Don't Know
Remaining cards (0)
Know
0:00
edit
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.

  Normal Size     Small Size show me how

GoPo Sup Ct Cases 3

Review of GoPo Supreme Court Cases 3

QuestionAnswer
Held that the fed. govt. could not require state and local police to enforce a fed. law w/o providing money and state acceptance of that fed. Support Printz v. U.S.
Upheld the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the Pacific coast during World War II Korematsu v. United States
Held that a university may use admissions standards involving race or ethnicity as one part of a complex admissions process but can not have fixed quotas for students of a particular race or ethnicity Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Found the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional because the 14th Amendment banned the violation of individual rights only by state governments Civil Rights Cases
Upheld Civil Rts. Act; reaffirmed Congress's broad powers under Commerce Clause Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S.
Upheld contribution limits in elections; said candidates could spend their own funds without limit; also held that since financial support of a candidate is protected under freedom of speech that individuals and outside groups could spend unlimited amount Buckley v. Valeo
The Court ruled in favor of students' rights to exercise their freedom of speech symbolically by wearing black armbands to protest the war in Vietnam. Tinker v. Des Moines
The Court ruled in this case that the government could not exercise prior restraint to prevent a newspaper from publishing negative information about the country's involvement in Vietnam New York Times Co. v. U.S.
Established that reapportionment for state legislature should be basedm, as much as possible, on population equality; forced many state legislatures to redraw their districting lines Reynolds v. Sims
Said that racial gerrymandering is subject to strict scrutiny and that districts should be compact, contiguous, and respectful of political subdivisions Shaw v. Reno
Created by: betsynewmark
 

 



Voices

Use these flashcards to help memorize information. Look at the large card and try to recall what is on the other side. Then click the card to flip it. If you knew the answer, click the green Know box. Otherwise, click the red Don't know box.

When you've placed seven or more cards in the Don't know box, click "retry" to try those cards again.

If you've accidentally put the card in the wrong box, just click on the card to take it out of the box.

You can also use your keyboard to move the cards as follows:

If you are logged in to your account, this website will remember which cards you know and don't know so that they are in the same box the next time you log in.

When you need a break, try one of the other activities listed below the flashcards like Matching, Snowman, or Hungry Bug. Although it may feel like you're playing a game, your brain is still making more connections with the information to help you out.

To see how well you know the information, try the Quiz or Test activity.

Pass complete!
"Know" box contains:
Time elapsed:
Retries:
restart all cards