Con Law I 2011 Word Scramble
|
Embed Code - If you would like this activity on your web page, copy the script below and paste it into your web page.
Normal Size Small Size show me how
Normal Size Small Size show me how
| Question | Answer |
| Slaughter-House cases | Held that the fund’al rights protected in the 1st 10 amends are not “priv and immunities of national citizenship” w/in the meaning of the 14th Amend. |
| Slaughter-House cases - cont. | And neither the Equal Protection, Due Process, nor Priv and Imm Clauses may be used to interfere with st control of the priv and imm of st citizenship. |
| Saenz v. Roe | Held that CA statute limiting the welfare benefits of first year residents was unconstitutional under the 14th Amend Priv and Immunities clause b/c this law violated the fundamental right to travel (heightened scrutiny). |
| Priv OR Immunities clause | 14th, Sect 1, state shall not abridge the priv OR immunities of US citizens. |
| Strict Scrutiny | when a law affects a fundamental right, legislature must have had a compelling interest and the measures must be the least restrictive means possible to accomplish its goal. |
| Enabling clause | 14th, sect 5, The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. |
| 14th Amend | No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the priv or immunities of citizens of the US; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jdx the equal prot |
Created by:
Bptree
Popular Law sets