Bristol Social Psychology Second year

Quiz yourself by guessing what should be in each of the black rectangles below before clicking on it to display the answer.
        Help  

Flap 1
Flap 2
Flap 3
Bargh 4 horsemen of automaticity   awareness, intention, efficiency, control   (blank)  
Awareness   Unaware of stimulus/effects on processing or behaviour   (blank)  
Intentionality   Do you want to start a process   (blank)  
Control   if aware of stimulus can you STOP its effects?   (blank)  
Efficiency   Cognitively demanding = might not occur under cognitive strain   (blank)  
3 levels of automatic behaviour   preconscious, postconscious & goal-directed   pre = notice stimulus but not effects, post = results from previous concious processing, goal = intent + consent, considering the self)  
Automaticity good?   Auto responses can be more accurate (Wilson & Schooler, 1991), frees up cog space   (blank)  
Bargh (1989)   recons we're always on auto pilot, with "if X then Y"   where X is environment cue and Y is behaviour  
James (1890)   thinking conciously about an action activates action tendancies associated with that action making them more accessible   Guiding behaviour in that particular direction  
Carver et al (1983)   Perception-action interface   Shocking the confederate. Ppts primed w hostility gave longer shocks to others when they answered questions wrongly  
Bargh, Chen & Burrows (1996)   Perception-behaviour interface,   Prime with politeness/rudeness. Wait for experimenter to finish a concersation. Ppl primed with rude far more likely to interrupt  
Dijksterhuis & Van Knippenberg (1998)   Percept-behaviour interface   ppts primed with professor do better than control in trivia persuit questions, those primed with secretary do worse than control.  
Dijksterhuis & Van Knippenberg (1998) 2   prime with elderly coridoor (Bargh?!?!)   (blank)  
Bargh (1993)   Perception-behaviour interface   Subliminaly prime with black v white faces, do boring dot task then "oh no i've lost the data, will you do it again?", black primed = more aggressive facial gestures & rude towards experimenter  
If everything is automatic, why don't we act on all our ideas?   boundary effect   eg Kissing experiment - we don't do it for many reasons eg. tendancy, current environment, morals etc  
William James (1890)   boundary effect   we don't do it cos other ideas rob them of their power.  
Norman and Shallice (1986)   Boundary effect, accesibility & activation of schema   behaviour controlled by automatic activation of schemas when everything is going to plan, but then change to supervisory attentional system when something novel happens. A schema will be selected if it reaches activation threshold and isn't inhibited.  


   

 
 

 
 

 
www.eapps.com




Copyright ©2001-2008 John Weidner All rights reserved.
About -  Terms of Service -  Privacy Statement