| Question |
Answer |
| Definitions and Etiologies of Acquired Aphasia: Definition |
Language disorder stemming from disease or accident that alters neurological functioning after a period of normal language development |
| Definitions and Etiologies of Acquired Aphasia: Etiologies |
Focal lesions: Confined to specific areas of brain resulting from penetrating injuries such as gunshot, stroke, hemorrhage, tumors
Diffuse lesions: Spread throughout brain resulting from traumatic brain injuries or poisoning
|
| Characteristics of Traumatic Brain Injury |
Diminished or altered state of consciousness
Impaired cognition
Impaired physical functioning
Disturbance of emotional and behavioral functioning
Temporary or permanent impairments
Partial or total functional and/or psychosocial maladjustment
|
| Causes and Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury |
Infants and Toddlers: falls and abuse
Preschoolers: falls
School-aged children: sports, accidents (bikes, MVA)
Adolescents: accidents (MVA)
Incidence
K – 12th grade: 4%
Special Education: 8% – 20%
|
| Glascow Coma Scale |
Eye opening
Motor responses
Verbal responses
Severity ratings
13 – 15 mild brain injury
9 – 12 moderate brain injury
Predictive of death/poor outcome but doesn’t correlate with level of future difficulties
|
| Acquired aphasia: Strokes, Tumors |
Uncommon in children vs. adults
1/3 occur during birth to 2 years
Cerebral hemorrhages create risk for reoccurrence
|
| Acquired aphasia: LKS |
Landau-Kleffner Syndrome
Low incidence
Convulsive disorder (seizures)
Indicated by abnormal EEG
|
| TBI, Landau-Kleffner Syndrome & CVA Characteristics |
Fine/gross motor skills: TBI impacted, LKS not affected, CVA with hemiparesis. Cognitive skills: TBI impacted, LKS not affected, CVA with lower verbal vs. performance scores
|
| TBI, Landau-Kleffner Syndrome & CVA Characteristics (2) |
Perceptual motor skills: Visual disturbances for all etiologies but worse for TBI
Behavior skills: Impacted in all etiologies; CVA least impacted
Social skills: Impacted in all etiologies; TBI most impacted
|
| Language development and recovery |
Recovery rates
75% show dramatic recovery of language unrelated to recovery of motor function
Associated seizure disorders reduce rate of recovery
25% + show residual aphasia and deficits in IQ & academic achievement testing one year post onset
|
| Acquired aphasia: recovery |
Toddlers/young children: best recovery
Older children: TBI recovery similar to adults
Aphasia secondary to seizures: better recovery at older ages
Fluent aphasia: worse prognosis vs. non-fluent aphasia
|
| Acute Recovery: Initial Three Months to One Year Post Onset-Comprehension
|
Corresponds to severity of injury
Corresponds to complexity of information
Worse in KLS vs. TBI and CVA
|
| Acute Recovery: Initial Three Months to One Year Post Onset-Word retrieval |
TBI: improves but persists 1 year post TBI
KLS: similar to language based LD
|
| Acute Recovery: Initial Three Months to One Year Post Onset-Syntax |
TBI & CVA: reduced number of utterances, shorter MLU, fewer complex sentences, writing more impaired than speaking KLS: nearly mute
|
| Acute Recovery: Initial Three Months to One Year Post Onset-Speech production |
TBI & CVA: dysarthria and dyspraxia
KLS: similar to children who are deaf
|
| Later Recovery and Residual Language Impairments: TBI |
Higher level language deficits for narratives, verbal disorganization, difficulty with inferences and nonliteral meanings
Similar to adolescents with language impairment
|
| Later Recovery and Residual Language Impairments: CVA |
Less elaborate language production; slower word retrieval but similar to typically developing children |
| Academic Achievement of Children with Acquired Aphasia: Academic problems |
May be placed in regular classroom settings
Achievement testing reveals difficulties for reading recognition (20%), reading comprehension (33%), spelling (55%), and arithmetic (85%)
Writing problematic for children with more severe TBI
|
| Academic Achievement of Children with Acquired Aphasia: Metacognitive & metalinguistic problems |
Limited self-awareness of comm. problems
Poor planning of narratives
Difficulty initiating conversation
Problems inhibiting inappropriate remarks
Failure to self-monitor conversations
General self-evaluations
Lack of flexibility for problem solving |
| Differences between Developmental and Acquired Language Disorders in Children |
Reaccess premorbid abilits, compensate for lost abilits, acquiring new skills
Differ in attitude, prof. of abilits. Prior: social/academic success
concept of normality
Problems with generalization, structuring, integration
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders : Hospital based |
Neurologist, physiatrist, pediatrician, neuropsychologist, SLP, OT, PT, MSW, RT, parent |
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders: School based |
SLP, psych, reg.ed., sped, OT, PT/adaptive PE, parent. Obtain info from sources
Hospital records for inpatient, acute rehab, home health/out-patient SLP & services,
Parent/teacher interviews, classroom observations, form/informal test
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Formal Testing
|
Cognitive/linguistic tests normed on children and adolescents with acquired aphasia
Assess cognitive issues such as attention span, memory, and executive functioning in addition to language functioning
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Formal Testing |
Standardized language tests assess developmental language skills
Not normed on children with acquired aphasia so interpret with extreme caution
Useful to determine eligibility and compare to typically developing peers
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Ross Information Processing Assessment – Primary
|
Normed on 115 children w/TBI, seizures,& LD ages 5;0–12;11
Ages 5–12 subtests: immed. memory, recent memory, spatial orient., recall of info
Ages 8–12 subtests: temporal org, org, problem solving, abstract reasoning
Standard scores and percentile ranks |
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Ross Information Processing Assessment (2nd Edition)
RIPA-2 (1996)
|
Normed on 126 individuals with TBI ages 15 - 90
10 subtests: immediate memory, recent memory, temporal orientation for recent/remote mem, spatial orientation, orientation to environ, recall of info, problem solv/abstract reason, org, auditory process/ret |
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Formal Testing: Comprehensive
|
Comprehensive language testing
CASL
CELF-4
TOLD series (TOLD-P:4, TOLD-I:4, TOAL-4)
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Formal Testing: Specialized |
Specialized language testing
LPT – 3 (Language Processing Test – 3)
TOPS – A (Test of Problem Solving – Adolescent)
TOPS – 3 (Test of Problem Solving – Elementary)
TOPL (Test of Pragmatic Language
|
| Assessment of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Informal Testing
|
Informal Testing
Language sampling and analysis
Narrative sampling and analysis
Performance differences in quiet versus noisy environments
|
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders |
• TBI is an eligibility category for special education services |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders: |
AC (augmentative and alternative communication) may be needed if the child’s speech is initially unintelligible or the child cannot speak• Recovery from TBI is often associated with aggression, impulsivity, disinhibition, antisocial behavior, withdrawal |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders: Intelligibility |
• Associated dysarthria and apraxia can co-exist with TBI and aphasia. |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders:Developmental Versus Remedial Intervention |
Preschoolers: developmental model |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders: Early & middle stages |
• Early Stages: modify environment and orient child |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders: Late stages |
• Late Stages: compensatory strategy training, use of memory devices, deductive reasoning and problem solving, identifying major points, self-monitoring |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Facilitative Versus Compensatory Intervention
|
Facilitative Versus Compensatory Intervention
Restoration of function
Socialization/emotional support w/peers
Instruction w/multi-modality cuing, self-monitoring, use of buddy
Assistive devices
Modify materials
|
| SLP Cognitive/Linguistic Therapy Goals and Objectives |
Goal: Improve memory skills
Immediate memory
Recent memory
|
| Cognitive/Linguistic Therapy Goals and Objectives |
) Goal: Improve orientation skills
Spatial
Temporal
|
| SLP Cognitive/Linguistic Therapy Goals and Objectives |
Goal: Improve higher level thinking skills
Problem solving
Abstract reasoning
Deductive reasoning
|
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
SLP Language Intervention
|
Goals and Objectives
1) Elementary school-aged child: same as for language and children with learning disabilities
2) Middle/high school aged child: same as for adolescents with language impairment
|
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Transitioning to School
|
SLP services initially provided in hospital setting (acute and acute rehabilitation) followed by home setting (home health) which are less demanding in areas of attention, concentration, and socialization |
| Intervention of Children with Acquired Language Disorders
Prerequisites for return to school |
Attend for 10 – 15 minutes
Tolerate 20 – 30 minutes of classroom stimulation
Function in small groups
Engage in meaningful conversation
Follow simple directions
Demonstrate potential for learning new information
|